Claude 2.1 vs Gemini 1.0 Pro: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison
Claude 2.1 vs Gemini 1.0 Pro compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.
Verdict
Claude 2.1 has lower listed token pricing, while Gemini 1.0 Pro can still be preferable if benchmark results better match your workload.
Author: Mirai Minds Research Team
Last updated:
Compare
to
Overview
Claude 2.1 was released the same time Gemini 1.0 Pro.
Provider The entity that provides this model. | ||
Input Context Window The number of tokens supported by the input context window. | 200K tokens | 32.8K tokens |
Maximum Output Tokens The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request. | Not specified. | 8,192 tokens |
Release Date When the model was first released. | Nov 23, 2023 over 1 yearago 2023-11-23 | Dec 13, 2023 over 1 year 2023-12-13 |
Leaderboard
Rank | 25 | 25 |
Arena Elo | 1119 | 1115 |
95% CI | +4/-3 | +6/-6 |
Votes | 39744 | 6818 |
License | Proprietary | Proprietary |
Knowledge Cutoff | Unknown | 4/2023 4/2023 |
Pricing
Input Cost of input data provided to the model. | $8.00 per million tokens | $12.50 per million tokens |
Output Cost of output tokens generated by the model. | $24.00 per million tokens | $37.50 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Claude 2.1 and Gemini 1.0 Pro Instruct.
MMLU Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings. | Benchmark not available. | 71.8 (5-shot) |
MMMU A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark. | Benchmark not available. | 47.9 |
HellaSwag A challenging sentence completion benchmark. | Benchmark not available. | Benchmark not available. |
