Background Logo

Claude 2.1 vs Gemini Ultra: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison

Claude 2.1 vs Gemini Ultra compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.

Verdict

Use pricing, benchmark scores, context window limits, and release recency together to choose between Claude 2.1 and Gemini Ultra.

Author: Mirai Minds Research Team

Last updated:

Compare
Claude 2.1
to
Gemini Ultra
Overview
Claude 2.1 was released 2 months before Gemini Ultra.
Claude 2.1
Gemini Ultra
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
Anthropic
Google
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
200K
tokens
32.8K
tokens
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
Not specified.
8,192
tokens
Release Date
When the model was first released.
2023-11-23
2024-02-08
Leaderboard
Claude 2.1
Gemini Ultra
Rank
25
Unknown
Arena Elo
1119
Not specified.
95% CI
+4/-3
Not specified.
Votes
39744
Not specified.
License
Proprietary
Not specified.
Knowledge Cutoff
Unknown
Unknown
Pricing
Claude 2.1
Gemini Ultra
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
$8.00
per million tokens
Pricing not available.
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
$24.00
per million tokens
Pricing not available.
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Claude 2.1 and Gemini Ultra Instruct.
Claude 2.1
Gemini Ultra
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
Benchmark not available.
83.7
(5-shot)
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
Benchmark not available.
59.4
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
Benchmark not available.
Benchmark not available.