Background Logo

Claude 3 Haiku vs Gemma 2 27B: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Gemma 2 27B compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.

Verdict

Gemma 2 27B has lower listed token pricing, while Claude 3 Haiku can still be preferable if benchmark results better match your workload.

Author: Mirai Minds Research Team

Last updated:

Compare
Claude 3 Haiku
to
Gemma 2 27B
Overview
Claude 3 Haiku was released 3 months before Gemma 2 27B.
Claude 3 Haiku
Gemma 2 27B
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
Anthropic
Google
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
200K
tokens
8,192
tokens
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
4,096
tokens
Not specified.
Release Date
When the model was first released.
2024-03-13
2024-06-27
Leaderboard
Claude 3 Haiku
Gemma 2 27B
Rank
11
Unknown
Arena Elo
1181
Not specified.
95% CI
+3/-3
Not specified.
Votes
66065
Not specified.
License
Proprietary
Not specified.
Knowledge Cutoff
8/2023
Unknown
Pricing
Claude 3 Haiku
Gemma 2 27B
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
$0.25
per million tokens
$0.27
per million tokens
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
$1.25
per million tokens
$0.27
per million tokens
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Claude 3 Haiku and Gemma 2 27B Instruct.
Claude 3 Haiku
Gemma 2 27B
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
76.7
(5-shot)
75.2
(5-shot)
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
50.2
Benchmark not available.
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
85.9
(10-shot)
86.4
(10-shot)