Background Logo

Claude 3 Haiku vs Llama 2 Chat 13B: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Llama 2 Chat 13B compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.

Verdict

Llama 2 Chat 13B has lower listed token pricing, while Claude 3 Haiku can still be preferable if benchmark results better match your workload.

Author: Mirai Minds Research Team

Last updated:

Compare
Claude 3 Haiku
to
Llama 2 Chat 13B
Overview
Claude 3 Haiku was released 8 months after Llama 2 Chat 13B.
Claude 3 Haiku
Llama 2 Chat 13B
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
Anthropic
Meta
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
200K
tokens
4,096
tokens
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
4,096
tokens
2,048
tokens
Release Date
When the model was first released.
2024-03-13
2023-07-18
Leaderboard
Claude 3 Haiku
Llama 2 Chat 13B
Rank
11
54
Arena Elo
1181
1040
95% CI
+3/-3
+5/-4
Votes
66065
17602
License
Proprietary
Llama 2 Community
Knowledge Cutoff
8/2023
7/2023
Pricing
Claude 3 Haiku
Llama 2 Chat 13B
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
$0.25
per million tokens
$0.10
per million tokens
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
$1.25
per million tokens
$0.50
per million tokens
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Claude 3 Haiku and Llama 2 Chat 13B Instruct.
Claude 3 Haiku
Llama 2 Chat 13B
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
76.7
(5-shot)
54.8
(5-shot)
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
50.2
Benchmark not available.
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
85.9
(10-shot)
Benchmark not available.