Background Logo

Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen3-235B-A22: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison

Claude 3 Haiku vs Qwen3-235B-A22 compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.

Verdict

Qwen3-235B-A22 has lower listed token pricing, while Claude 3 Haiku can still be preferable if benchmark results better match your workload.

Author: Mirai Minds Research Team

Last updated:

Compare
Claude 3 Haiku
to
Qwen3-235B-A22
Overview
Claude 3 Haiku was released 13 months before Qwen3-235B-A22.
Claude 3 Haiku
Qwen3-235B-A22
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
Anthropic
Qwen
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
200K
tokens
128K
tokens
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
4,096
tokens
128k
tokens
Release Date
When the model was first released.
2024-03-13
2025-04-29
Leaderboard
Claude 3 Haiku
Qwen3-235B-A22
Rank
11
Unknown
Arena Elo
1181
Not specified.
95% CI
+3/-3
Not specified.
Votes
66065
Not specified.
License
Proprietary
Not specified.
Knowledge Cutoff
8/2023
Unknown
Pricing
Claude 3 Haiku
Qwen3-235B-A22
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
$0.25
per million tokens
$0.10
per million tokens
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
$1.25
per million tokens
$0.10
per million tokens
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Claude 3 Haiku and Qwen3-235B-A22 Instruct.
Claude 3 Haiku
Qwen3-235B-A22
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
76.7
(5-shot)
Benchmark not available.
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
50.2
Benchmark not available.
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
85.9
(10-shot)
Benchmark not available.