Background Logo

Claude 3 Opus vs Gemini 1.5 Pro: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Gemini 1.5 Pro compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.

Verdict

Gemini 1.5 Pro has lower listed token pricing, while Claude 3 Opus can still be preferable if benchmark results better match your workload.

Author: Mirai Minds Research Team

Last updated:

Compare
Claude 3 Opus
to
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Overview
Claude 3 Opus was released 1 months before Gemini 1.5 Pro.
Claude 3 Opus
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
Anthropic
Google
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
200K
tokens
1M
tokens
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
4,096
tokens
8,192
tokens
Release Date
When the model was first released.
2024-03-04
2024-02-15
Leaderboard
Claude 3 Opus
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Rank
2
Unknown
Arena Elo
1251
Not specified.
95% CI
+3/-3
Not specified.
Votes
75684
Not specified.
License
Proprietary
Not specified.
Knowledge Cutoff
8/2023
Unknown
Pricing
Claude 3 Opus
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
$15.00
per million tokens
$3.5
per million tokens
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
$75.00
per million tokens
$10.5
per million tokens
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Claude 3 Opus and Gemini 1.5 Pro Instruct.
Claude 3 Opus
Gemini 1.5 Pro
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
88.2
(5-shot)
81.9
(5-shot)
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
59.4
58.5
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
95.4
(10-shot)
Benchmark not available.