Background Logo

Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 2 27B: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Gemma 2 27B compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.

Verdict

Gemma 2 27B has lower listed token pricing, while Claude 3 Opus can still be preferable if benchmark results better match your workload.

Author: Mirai Minds Research Team

Last updated:

Compare
Claude 3 Opus
to
Gemma 2 27B
Overview
Claude 3 Opus was released 3 months before Gemma 2 27B.
Claude 3 Opus
Gemma 2 27B
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
Anthropic
Google
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
200K
tokens
8,192
tokens
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
4,096
tokens
Not specified.
Release Date
When the model was first released.
2024-03-04
2024-06-27
Leaderboard
Claude 3 Opus
Gemma 2 27B
Rank
2
Unknown
Arena Elo
1251
Not specified.
95% CI
+3/-3
Not specified.
Votes
75684
Not specified.
License
Proprietary
Not specified.
Knowledge Cutoff
8/2023
Unknown
Pricing
Claude 3 Opus
Gemma 2 27B
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
$15.00
per million tokens
$0.27
per million tokens
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
$75.00
per million tokens
$0.27
per million tokens
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Claude 3 Opus and Gemma 2 27B Instruct.
Claude 3 Opus
Gemma 2 27B
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
88.2
(5-shot)
75.2
(5-shot)
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
59.4
Benchmark not available.
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
95.4
(10-shot)
86.4
(10-shot)