Background Logo
Mirai Minds

Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen-Max: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Qwen-Max compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.

Verdict

Qwen-Max has lower listed token pricing, while Claude 3 Opus can still be preferable if benchmark results better match your workload.

Author: Mirai Minds Research Team

Last updated:

Sources

Compare
Claude 3 Opus
to
Qwen-Max
Overview
Claude 3 Opus was released 10 months before Qwen-Max.
Claude 3 Opus
Qwen-Max
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
Anthropic
Qwen
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
200K
tokens
30,720
tokens
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
4,096
tokens
8,192
tokens
Release Date
When the model was first released.
2024-03-04
2025-01-28
Leaderboard
Claude 3 Opus
Qwen-Max
Rank
2
Unknown
Arena Elo
1251
Not specified.
95% CI
+3/-3
Not specified.
Votes
75684
Not specified.
License
Proprietary
Not specified.
Knowledge Cutoff
8/2023
Unknown
Pricing
Claude 3 Opus
Qwen-Max
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
$15.00
per million tokens
$1.60
per million tokens
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
$75.00
per million tokens
$6.40
per million tokens
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Claude 3 Opus and Qwen-Max Instruct.
Claude 3 Opus
Qwen-Max
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
88.2
(5-shot)
Source
Benchmark not available.
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
59.4
Source
Benchmark not available.
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
95.4
(10-shot)
Source
Benchmark not available.

Ready to kick off?

sneh[at]miraiminds.co

© 2026 Mirai Minds

Mirai Minds

Mirai Minds