Background Logo

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 2.5 Pro: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison

Claude 3.5 Haiku vs Gemini 2.5 Pro compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.

Verdict

Claude 3.5 Haiku has lower listed token pricing, while Gemini 2.5 Pro can still be preferable if benchmark results better match your workload.

Author: Mirai Minds Research Team

Last updated:

Compare
Claude 3.5 Haiku
to
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Overview
Claude 3.5 Haiku was released 4 months before Gemini 2.5 Pro.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
Anthropic
Google
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
200K
tokens
2M
tokens
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
8,192
tokens
64K
tokens
Release Date
When the model was first released.
2024-11-04
2025-03-25
Leaderboard
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Rank
Unknown
Unknown
Arena Elo
Not specified.
Not specified.
95% CI
Not specified.
Not specified.
Votes
Not specified.
Not specified.
License
Not specified.
Not specified.
Knowledge Cutoff
Unknown
Unknown
Pricing
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 2.5 Pro
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
$0.80
per million tokens
$1.25
per million tokens
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
$4.00
per million tokens
$10.00
per million tokens
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Claude 3.5 Haiku and Gemini 2.5 Pro Instruct.
Claude 3.5 Haiku
Gemini 2.5 Pro
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
Benchmark not available.
Benchmark not available.
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
Benchmark not available.
81.7
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
Benchmark not available.
Benchmark not available.