Claude 4 Opus vs Llama 2 Chat 70B: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison
Claude 4 Opus vs Llama 2 Chat 70B compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.
Verdict
Llama 2 Chat 70B has lower listed token pricing, while Claude 4 Opus can still be preferable if benchmark results better match your workload.
Author: Mirai Minds Research Team
Last updated:
Compare
to
Overview
Claude 4 Opus was released 23 months after Llama 2 Chat 70B.
Provider The entity that provides this model. | ||
Input Context Window The number of tokens supported by the input context window. | 200K tokens | 4,096 tokens |
Maximum Output Tokens The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request. | 32,000 tokens | 2,048 tokens |
Release Date When the model was first released. | May 22, 2025 over 1 yearago 2025-05-22 | Jul 18, 2023 over 1 year 2023-07-18 |
Leaderboard
Rank | Unknown | 41 |
Arena Elo | Not specified. | 1088 |
95% CI | Not specified. | +3/-4 |
Votes | Not specified. | 38748 |
License | Not specified. | Llama 2 Community |
Knowledge Cutoff | Unknown | 7/2023 7/2023 |
Pricing
Input Cost of input data provided to the model. | $15 per million tokens | $0.65 per million tokens |
Output Cost of output tokens generated by the model. | $75 per million tokens | $2.75 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Claude 4 Opus and Llama 2 Chat 70B Instruct.
MMLU Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings. | Benchmark not available. | 68.9 (5-shot) |
MMMU A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark. | 76.5 | 30.1 |
HellaSwag A challenging sentence completion benchmark. | Benchmark not available. | Benchmark not available. |
