Background Logo

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen-Max: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison

Gemini 1.0 Pro vs Qwen-Max compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.

Verdict

Qwen-Max has lower listed token pricing, while Gemini 1.0 Pro can still be preferable if benchmark results better match your workload.

Author: Mirai Minds Research Team

Last updated:

Compare
Gemini 1.0 Pro
to
Qwen-Max
Overview
Gemini 1.0 Pro was released 13 months before Qwen-Max.
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Qwen-Max
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
Google
Qwen
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
32.8K
tokens
30,720
tokens
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
8,192
tokens
8,192
tokens
Release Date
When the model was first released.
2023-12-13
2025-01-28
Leaderboard
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Qwen-Max
Rank
25
Unknown
Arena Elo
1115
Not specified.
95% CI
+6/-6
Not specified.
Votes
6818
Not specified.
License
Proprietary
Not specified.
Knowledge Cutoff
4/2023
Unknown
Pricing
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Qwen-Max
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
$12.50
per million tokens
$1.60
per million tokens
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
$37.50
per million tokens
$6.40
per million tokens
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemini 1.0 Pro and Qwen-Max Instruct.
Gemini 1.0 Pro
Qwen-Max
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
71.8
(5-shot)
Benchmark not available.
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
47.9
Benchmark not available.
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
Benchmark not available.
Benchmark not available.