Background Logo

Gemini Ultra vs Phi-4: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison

Gemini Ultra vs Phi-4 compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.

Verdict

Use pricing, benchmark scores, context window limits, and release recency together to choose between Gemini Ultra and Phi-4.

Author: Mirai Minds Research Team

Last updated:

Compare
Gemini Ultra
to
Phi-4
Overview
Gemini Ultra was released 10 months before Phi-4.
Gemini Ultra
Phi-4
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
Google
Microsoft
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
32.8K
tokens
4,000
tokens
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
8,192
tokens
4,000
tokens
Release Date
When the model was first released.
2024-02-08
2024-12-12
Leaderboard
Gemini Ultra
Phi-4
Rank
Unknown
Unknown
Arena Elo
Not specified.
Not specified.
95% CI
Not specified.
Not specified.
Votes
Not specified.
Not specified.
License
Not specified.
Microsoft Research License Agreement
Knowledge Cutoff
Unknown
Unknown
Pricing
Gemini Ultra
Phi-4
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
Pricing not available.
$0.125
per million tokens
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
Pricing not available.
$0.5
per million tokens
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemini Ultra and Phi-4 Instruct.
Gemini Ultra
Phi-4
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
83.7
(5-shot)
Benchmark not available.
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
59.4
Benchmark not available.
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
Benchmark not available.
Benchmark not available.