Background Logo

Gemma 2 27B vs Llama 2 Chat 70B: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison

Gemma 2 27B vs Llama 2 Chat 70B compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.

Verdict

Gemma 2 27B has lower listed token pricing, while Llama 2 Chat 70B can still be preferable if benchmark results better match your workload.

Author: Mirai Minds Research Team

Last updated:

Compare
Gemma 2 27B
to
Llama 2 Chat 70B
Overview
Gemma 2 27B was released 12 months after Llama 2 Chat 70B.
Gemma 2 27B
Llama 2 Chat 70B
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
Google
Meta
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
8,192
tokens
4,096
tokens
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
Not specified.
2,048
tokens
Release Date
When the model was first released.
2024-06-27
2023-07-18
Leaderboard
Gemma 2 27B
Llama 2 Chat 70B
Rank
Unknown
41
Arena Elo
Not specified.
1088
95% CI
Not specified.
+3/-4
Votes
Not specified.
38748
License
Not specified.
Llama 2 Community
Knowledge Cutoff
Unknown
7/2023
Pricing
Gemma 2 27B
Llama 2 Chat 70B
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
$0.27
per million tokens
$0.65
per million tokens
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
$0.27
per million tokens
$2.75
per million tokens
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Gemma 2 27B and Llama 2 Chat 70B Instruct.
Gemma 2 27B
Llama 2 Chat 70B
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
75.2
(5-shot)
68.9
(5-shot)
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
Benchmark not available.
30.1
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
86.4
(10-shot)
Benchmark not available.