Background Logo

Llama 2 Chat 13B vs Phi-4: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison

Llama 2 Chat 13B vs Phi-4 compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.

Verdict

Llama 2 Chat 13B has lower listed token pricing, while Phi-4 can still be preferable if benchmark results better match your workload.

Author: Mirai Minds Research Team

Last updated:

Compare
Llama 2 Chat 13B
to
Phi-4
Overview
Llama 2 Chat 13B was released 16 months before Phi-4.
Llama 2 Chat 13B
Phi-4
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
Meta
Microsoft
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
4,096
tokens
4,000
tokens
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
2,048
tokens
4,000
tokens
Release Date
When the model was first released.
2023-07-18
2024-12-12
Leaderboard
Llama 2 Chat 13B
Phi-4
Rank
54
Unknown
Arena Elo
1040
Not specified.
95% CI
+5/-4
Not specified.
Votes
17602
Not specified.
License
Llama 2 Community
Microsoft Research License Agreement
Knowledge Cutoff
7/2023
Unknown
Pricing
Llama 2 Chat 13B
Phi-4
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
$0.10
per million tokens
$0.125
per million tokens
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
$0.50
per million tokens
$0.5
per million tokens
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Llama 2 Chat 13B and Phi-4 Instruct.
Llama 2 Chat 13B
Phi-4
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
54.8
(5-shot)
Benchmark not available.
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
Benchmark not available.
Benchmark not available.
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
Benchmark not available.
Benchmark not available.