Background Logo
Mirai Minds

Phi-4 vs Qwen3-32B: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison

Phi-4 vs Qwen3-32B compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.

Verdict

Qwen3-32B has lower listed token pricing, while Phi-4 can still be preferable if benchmark results better match your workload.

Author: Mirai Minds Research Team

Last updated:

Sources

Compare
Phi-4
to
Qwen3-32B
Overview
Phi-4 was released 4 months before Qwen3-32B.
Phi-4
Qwen3-32B
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
Microsoft
Qwen
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
4,000
tokens
128K
tokens
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
4,000
tokens
128K
tokens
Release Date
When the model was first released.
2024-12-12
2025-04-29
Leaderboard
Phi-4
Qwen3-32B
Rank
Unknown
Unknown
Arena Elo
Not specified.
Not specified.
95% CI
Not specified.
Not specified.
Votes
Not specified.
Not specified.
License
Microsoft Research License Agreement
Not specified.
Knowledge Cutoff
Unknown
Unknown
Pricing
Phi-4
Qwen3-32B
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
$0.125
per million tokens
$0.10
per million tokens
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
$0.5
per million tokens
$0.30
per million tokens
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Phi-4 and Qwen3-32B Instruct.
Phi-4
Qwen3-32B
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
Benchmark not available.
Benchmark not available.
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
Benchmark not available.
Benchmark not available.
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
Benchmark not available.
Benchmark not available.

Ready to kick off?

sneh[at]miraiminds.co

© 2026 Mirai Minds

Mirai Minds

Mirai Minds