Background Logo
Mirai Minds

Apollo vs GPT-4.1 Nano: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison

Apollo vs GPT-4.1 Nano compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.

Verdict

Use pricing, benchmark scores, context window limits, and release recency together to choose between Apollo and GPT-4.1 Nano.

Author: Mirai Minds Research Team

Last updated:

Sources

Compare
Apollo
to
GPT-4.1 Nano
Overview
Apollo was released 3 months before GPT-4.1 Nano.
Apollo
GPT-4.1 Nano
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
Meta
OpenAI
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
Not specified.
1M
tokens
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
Not specified.
32K
tokens
Release Date
When the model was first released.
2024-12-16
2025-04-14
Leaderboard
Apollo
GPT-4.1 Nano
Rank
Unknown
Unknown
Arena Elo
Not specified.
Not specified.
95% CI
Not specified.
Not specified.
Votes
Not specified.
Not specified.
License
Not specified.
Not specified.
Knowledge Cutoff
Unknown
Unknown
Pricing
Apollo
GPT-4.1 Nano
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
Pricing not available.
$0.10
per million tokens
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
Pricing not available.
$0.40
per million tokens
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Apollo and GPT-4.1 Nano Instruct.
Apollo
GPT-4.1 Nano
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
Benchmark not available.
80.1
(5-shot)
Source
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
Benchmark not available.
55.4
Source
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
Benchmark not available.
Benchmark not available.

Ready to kick off?

sneh[at]miraiminds.co

© 2026 Mirai Minds

Mirai Minds

Mirai Minds