Claude 3 Opus vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison
Claude 3 Opus vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.
Verdict
Claude 3.7 Sonnet has lower listed token pricing, while Claude 3 Opus can still be preferable if benchmark results better match your workload.
Author: Mirai Minds Research Team
Last updated:
Compare
to
Overview
Claude 3 Opus was released 11 months before Claude 3.7 Sonnet.
Provider The entity that provides this model. | ||
Input Context Window The number of tokens supported by the input context window. | 200K tokens | 200K tokens |
Maximum Output Tokens The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request. | 4,096 tokens | 8,192 tokens |
Release Date When the model was first released. | Mar 04, 2024 over 1 yearago 2024-03-04 | Feb 24, 2025 over 1 year 2025-02-24 |
Leaderboard
Rank | 2 | Unknown |
Arena Elo | 1251 | Not specified. |
95% CI | +3/-3 | Not specified. |
Votes | 75684 | Not specified. |
License | Proprietary | Not specified. |
Knowledge Cutoff | 8/2023 8/2023 | Unknown |
Pricing
Input Cost of input data provided to the model. | $15.00 per million tokens | $3 per million tokens |
Output Cost of output tokens generated by the model. | $75.00 per million tokens | $15 per million tokens |
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Claude 3 Opus and Claude 3.7 Sonnet Instruct.
MMLU Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings. | 88.2 (5-shot) | Benchmark not available. |
MMMU A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark. | 59.4 | 71.8 |
HellaSwag A challenging sentence completion benchmark. | 95.4 (10-shot) | Benchmark not available. |
