Background Logo

Claude 3 Opus vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs Claude 3.7 Sonnet compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.

Verdict

Claude 3.7 Sonnet has lower listed token pricing, while Claude 3 Opus can still be preferable if benchmark results better match your workload.

Author: Mirai Minds Research Team

Last updated:

Compare
Claude 3 Opus
to
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Overview
Claude 3 Opus was released 11 months before Claude 3.7 Sonnet.
Claude 3 Opus
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
Anthropic
Anthropic
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
200K
tokens
200K
tokens
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
4,096
tokens
8,192
tokens
Release Date
When the model was first released.
2024-03-04
2025-02-24
Leaderboard
Claude 3 Opus
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Rank
2
Unknown
Arena Elo
1251
Not specified.
95% CI
+3/-3
Not specified.
Votes
75684
Not specified.
License
Proprietary
Not specified.
Knowledge Cutoff
8/2023
Unknown
Pricing
Claude 3 Opus
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
$15.00
per million tokens
$3
per million tokens
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
$75.00
per million tokens
$15
per million tokens
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Claude 3 Opus and Claude 3.7 Sonnet Instruct.
Claude 3 Opus
Claude 3.7 Sonnet
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
88.2
(5-shot)
Benchmark not available.
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
59.4
71.8
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
95.4
(10-shot)
Benchmark not available.