Background Logo

Claude 3 Opus vs QwQ-32B-Preview: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison

Claude 3 Opus vs QwQ-32B-Preview compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.

Verdict

QwQ-32B-Preview has lower listed token pricing, while Claude 3 Opus can still be preferable if benchmark results better match your workload.

Author: Mirai Minds Research Team

Last updated:

Compare
Claude 3 Opus
to
QwQ-32B-Preview
Overview
Claude 3 Opus was released 8 months before QwQ-32B-Preview.
Claude 3 Opus
QwQ-32B-Preview
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
Anthropic
Qwen
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
200K
tokens
32000
tokens
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
4,096
tokens
Not specified.
Release Date
When the model was first released.
2024-03-04
2024-11-28
Leaderboard
Claude 3 Opus
QwQ-32B-Preview
Rank
2
Unknown
Arena Elo
1251
Not specified.
95% CI
+3/-3
Not specified.
Votes
75684
Not specified.
License
Proprietary
Research Preview
Knowledge Cutoff
8/2023
11/2024
Pricing
Claude 3 Opus
QwQ-32B-Preview
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
$15.00
per million tokens
$0.12
per million tokens
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
$75.00
per million tokens
$0.18
per million tokens
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Claude 3 Opus and QwQ-32B-Preview Instruct.
Claude 3 Opus
QwQ-32B-Preview
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
88.2
(5-shot)
Benchmark not available.
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
59.4
Benchmark not available.
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
95.4
(10-shot)
Benchmark not available.