Background Logo

GPT-4.1 Nano vs LLaMA 4 Scout: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison

GPT-4.1 Nano vs LLaMA 4 Scout compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.

Verdict

GPT-4.1 Nano has lower listed token pricing, while LLaMA 4 Scout can still be preferable if benchmark results better match your workload.

Author: Mirai Minds Research Team

Last updated:

Compare
GPT-4.1 Nano
to
LLaMA 4 Scout
Overview
GPT-4.1 Nano was released the same time LLaMA 4 Scout.
GPT-4.1 Nano
LLaMA 4 Scout
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
OpenAI
Meta
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
1M
tokens
1M
tokens
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
32K
tokens
Not specified.
Release Date
When the model was first released.
2025-04-14
2025-04-05
Leaderboard
GPT-4.1 Nano
LLaMA 4 Scout
Rank
Unknown
Unknown
Arena Elo
Not specified.
Not specified.
95% CI
Not specified.
Not specified.
Votes
Not specified.
Not specified.
License
Not specified.
Not specified.
Knowledge Cutoff
Unknown
Unknown
Pricing
GPT-4.1 Nano
LLaMA 4 Scout
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
$0.10
per million tokens
$0.15
per million tokens
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
$0.40
per million tokens
$0.40
per million tokens
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between GPT-4.1 Nano and LLaMA 4 Scout Instruct.
GPT-4.1 Nano
LLaMA 4 Scout
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
80.1
(5-shot)
Benchmark not available.
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
55.4
69.4
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
Benchmark not available.
Benchmark not available.