Background Logo

GPT-4o mini vs Llama 2 Chat 13B: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison

GPT-4o mini vs Llama 2 Chat 13B compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.

Verdict

Llama 2 Chat 13B has lower listed token pricing, while GPT-4o mini can still be preferable if benchmark results better match your workload.

Author: Mirai Minds Research Team

Last updated:

Compare
GPT-4o mini
to
Llama 2 Chat 13B
Overview
GPT-4o mini was released 13 months after Llama 2 Chat 13B.
GPT-4o mini
Llama 2 Chat 13B
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
OpenAI
Meta
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
128000
tokens
4,096
tokens
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
16,384
tokens
2,048
tokens
Release Date
When the model was first released.
2024-07-18
2023-07-18
Leaderboard
GPT-4o mini
Llama 2 Chat 13B
Rank
Unknown
54
Arena Elo
Not specified.
1040
95% CI
Not specified.
+5/-4
Votes
Not specified.
17602
License
Not specified.
Llama 2 Community
Knowledge Cutoff
Unknown
7/2023
Pricing
GPT-4o mini
Llama 2 Chat 13B
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
$0.15
per million tokens
$0.10
per million tokens
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
$0.60
per million tokens
$0.50
per million tokens
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between GPT-4o mini and Llama 2 Chat 13B Instruct.
GPT-4o mini
Llama 2 Chat 13B
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
82
(5-shot)
54.8
(5-shot)
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
59.4
Benchmark not available.
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
Benchmark not available.
Benchmark not available.