Background Logo

Mistral Large vs Phi-4: Benchmarks, Pricing, and Context Window Comparison

Mistral Large vs Phi-4 compares provider, context window, token pricing, benchmark performance, and release timeline in one side-by-side view. Use this page to quickly identify which model is a better fit for your production constraints, quality targets, and estimated cost per request.

Verdict

Phi-4 has lower listed token pricing, while Mistral Large can still be preferable if benchmark results better match your workload.

Author: Mirai Minds Research Team

Last updated:

Compare
Mistral Large
to
Phi-4
Overview
Mistral Large was released 9 months before Phi-4.
Mistral Large
Phi-4
Provider
The entity that provides this model.
Mistral
Microsoft
Input Context Window
The number of tokens supported by the input context window.
32K
tokens
4,000
tokens
Maximum Output Tokens
The number of tokens that can be generated by the model in a single request.
4,096
tokens
4,000
tokens
Release Date
When the model was first released.
2024-02-26
2024-12-12
Leaderboard
Mistral Large
Phi-4
Rank
Unknown
Unknown
Arena Elo
Not specified.
Not specified.
95% CI
Not specified.
Not specified.
Votes
Not specified.
Not specified.
License
Not specified.
Microsoft Research License Agreement
Knowledge Cutoff
Unknown
Unknown
Pricing
Mistral Large
Phi-4
Input
Cost of input data provided to the model.
$8.00
per million tokens
$0.125
per million tokens
Output
Cost of output tokens generated by the model.
$8.00
per million tokens
$0.5
per million tokens
Benchmarks
Compare relevant benchmarks between Mistral Large and Phi-4 Instruct.
Mistral Large
Phi-4
MMLU
Evaluating LLM knowledge acquisition in zero-shot and few-shot settings.
81.2
(5-shot)
Benchmark not available.
MMMU
A wide ranging multi-discipline and multimodal benchmark.
Benchmark not available.
Benchmark not available.
HellaSwag
A challenging sentence completion benchmark.
89.2
(10-shot)
Benchmark not available.